Interactive Brokers (U.K.) Limited
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) · Reference 208159 2
Listed as Authorised in the FCA's investment firms register, first authorised 6 February 2002.
Interactive Brokers is a US-based multi-asset broker owned by Interactive Brokers Group, Inc., which is listed on Nasdaq and controlled by its founder, Thomas Peterffy. It offers forex and CFDs alongside shares, options and futures through Interactive Brokers LLC in the US and affiliates including Interactive Brokers (U.K.) Limited, Interactive Brokers Ireland Limited, Interactive Brokers Australia, Interactive Brokers Singapore, Interactive Brokers Hong Kong, Interactive Brokers Canada and Interactive Brokers Securities Japan.
Research-based assessment This profile has not completed TTI’s on-site verification and 30-day platform review. How TTI verification works
| Regulator | Licence | Legal entity | Register status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) | 208159 | Interactive Brokers (U.K.) Limited | Authorised Checked 4 Oct 2026 | Register entry for Interactive Brokers (U.K.) Limited (opens in a new tab) 2 |
| Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) | C423427 | Interactive Brokers Ireland Limited | Authorised Checked 4 Oct 2026 | Register entry for Interactive Brokers Ireland Limited (opens in a new tab) 5 |
| Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) | AFSL 453554 | Interactive Brokers Australia Pty Ltd | Authorised Checked 4 Oct 2026 | Register entry for Interactive Brokers Australia Pty Ltd (opens in a new tab) 3 |
| Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) | CMS100917 | Interactive Brokers Singapore Pte Ltd | Authorised Checked 4 Oct 2026 | Register entry for Interactive Brokers Singapore Pte Ltd (opens in a new tab) 4 |
Each licence was matched on the regulator’s own register on the date shown. Unverified claims are listed under Regulation and legal entities.
Interactive Brokers is controlled by its listed parent and founder, publishes detailed entity information for each of its regulated affiliates, and its UK company’s terms provide segregated client money, FSCS participation and access to the Financial Ombudsman Service. We matched its UK, Irish, Australian and Singapore companies on their regulators’ registers. Its enforcement record is the heaviest among the brokers we have assessed: since 2018 regulators in the US, UK, Australia and Hong Kong have fined it for anti-money laundering and sanctions failures, record-keeping, market abuse surveillance, client asset handling and order marking, including USD 55 million over off-channel communications in 2023 and an OFAC settlement in 2025. Its enforcement dimension scores zero under our methodology. The UK ombudsman upholds complaints against IBUK slightly more often than average.
The website lists every affiliate with its regulator, registration numbers, registered office and website, and the UK terms name the contracting company.
IBUK holds client money in segregated accounts under the FCA client asset rules.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. is listed on Nasdaq, and its annual report identifies founder Thomas Peterffy as the controlling owner through IBG Holdings LLC.
The registers we checked show the companies as currently authorised, with no suspension or restriction.
Full legal names, registration numbers and registered addresses are published for the client-facing companies.
Reduced the enforcement dimension by 12.5 points (high severity, 5 years before the review, counted at half weight).
Reduced the enforcement dimension by 10 points (moderate severity, 1.2 years before the review).
Reduced the enforcement dimension by 10 points (moderate severity, 1 years before the review).
Reduced the enforcement dimension by 10 points (moderate severity, 2.8 years before the review).
Reduced the enforcement dimension by 10 points (moderate severity, 1.8 years before the review).
Each dimension is scored from its criteria, then weighted. Dimensions without enough evidence are left out and the remaining weights are rescaled. Open a dimension to see every criterion, our rationale and the sources.
Whether the firm’s licences exist, are current and cover what it offers.
Client-facing entities appear on the regulator’s register 12345
We matched Interactive Brokers (U.K.) on the FCA’s list, Interactive Brokers Ireland on the Central Bank of Ireland’s register, Interactive Brokers Australia in ASIC’s data and Interactive Brokers Singapore in MAS’s directory. We did not verify the US, Hong Kong, Canadian and Japanese companies on their registers.
Permissions cover the services offered 4
MAS lists permissions covering OTC derivatives and leveraged FX for the Singapore company. We could not confirm the UK and other companies’ permissions on a register.
Criteria and their weighting are explained in the methodology.
Whether you can find out who owns and runs the firm.
Legal entity details are published 1
Full legal names, registration numbers and registered addresses are published for the client-facing companies.
Ultimate ownership can be identified 7
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. is listed on Nasdaq, and its annual report identifies founder Thomas Peterffy as the controlling owner through IBG Holdings LLC.
Financial statements are available 7
The listed parent files audited annual reports with the SEC.
Criteria and their weighting are explained in the methodology.
What protects client money if something goes wrong.
Client money segregation is disclosed 6
IBUK holds client money in segregated accounts under the FCA client asset rules.
Retail clients have negative balance protection
IBUK’s general terms treat negative balances as amounts owed by the client; we did not find a statement of negative balance protection for retail CFD clients in the documents we reviewed.
An investor compensation scheme applies 16
Interactive Brokers states that IBUK participates in the FSCS, Interactive Brokers Ireland in the Irish Investor Compensation Scheme, Interactive Brokers LLC in SIPC and Interactive Brokers Canada in CIPF. We did not confirm cover for clients of the Australian, Singapore, Hong Kong and Japanese companies.
Banking and custody arrangements are disclosed 6
We did not find the banks or custodians holding client money named in the documents we reviewed.
Withdrawal terms are disclosed
We did not review withdrawal fees and processing times.
Criteria and their weighting are explained in the methodology.
Regulator warnings, enforcement actions and final legal findings on record.
Starts at 100 and loses points for each substantiated adverse finding by severity and age. Allegations, complaints and clone warnings never count. Total deducted: 87.5 points.
Warning lists and enforcement records have been searched 891011121314
We reviewed FINRA’s BrokerCheck report and searched the FCA, ASIC, SFC, OFAC, CySEC and CVM records, the Indian and Malaysian alert lists, and ran web searches for actions by the firm’s other regulators. The searches are cited with their dates.
SEC and CFTC fine Interactive Brokers USD 55 million over off-channel communications 8
29 Sept 2023. Reduced the enforcement dimension by 5 points (moderate severity, 3 years before the review, counted at half weight).
US options exchanges fine Interactive Brokers USD 7.75 million for mismarking orders 8
30 Sept 2025. Reduced the enforcement dimension by 10 points (moderate severity, 1 years before the review).
FINRA fines Interactive Brokers USD 3.5 million over execution quality reviews 8
22 Dec 2023. Reduced the enforcement dimension by 10 points (moderate severity, 2.8 years before the review).
FINRA fines Interactive Brokers USD 2.25 million for failing to detect free-riding 8
30 Dec 2024. Reduced the enforcement dimension by 10 points (moderate severity, 1.8 years before the review).
SFC reprimands and fines Interactive Brokers Hong Kong HKD 4.2 million 12
28 Apr 2025. Reduced the enforcement dimension by 10 points (moderate severity, 1.4 years before the review).
Interactive Brokers Australia pays AUD 832,500 over suspicious trading controls 13
20 Sept 2023. Reduced the enforcement dimension by 5 points (moderate severity, 3 years before the review, counted at half weight).
CFTC order over supervision during April 2020 oil futures turmoil, with USD 82.57 million restitution 8
28 Sept 2021. Reduced the enforcement dimension by 12.5 points (high severity, 5 years before the review, counted at half weight).
NFA fines Interactive Brokers USD 250,000 for cancelling retail forex orders 8
14 Apr 2022. Reduced the enforcement dimension by 5 points (moderate severity, 4.5 years before the review, counted at half weight).
CFTC fines Interactive Brokers for overcharging exchange fees 8
30 Jun 2022. Reduced the enforcement dimension by 5 points (moderate severity, 4.3 years before the review, counted at half weight).
FCA fines Interactive Brokers (UK) GBP 1.05 million for market abuse controls 11
25 Jan 2018. Reduced the enforcement dimension by 2.5 points (moderate severity, 8.7 years before the review, counted at a quarter of its weight).
Criteria and their weighting are explained in the methodology.
How the firm handles complaints, and what independent records show.
A complaints procedure is published 6
The UK terms explain how to complain and how complaints are handled.
Independent dispute resolution is available 6
UK clients can take unresolved complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Independent complaint outcomes show no adverse pattern 15
In the ombudsman’s latest data, 37% of resolved cases about IBUK were upheld, slightly above the 34% average for investment complaints.
Criteria and their weighting are explained in the methodology.
Whether costs, execution and risks are disclosed before you sign up.
Costs are disclosed before account opening 1
Interactive Brokers publishes commission and fee schedules and states it charges no custody fees, but we did not review the CFD financing and currency conversion charges for this assessment.
An order execution policy is published
We did not review the order execution policy for this assessment.
The client agreement is available before sign-up 6
IBUK’s general terms of business can be read without an account.
Leverage and margin terms are disclosed
We did not find maximum leverage, margin call or close-out levels in the documents reviewed.
Risk warnings are clear and current 1
The UK site shows general risk warnings, but the homepage does not show the share of retail CFD accounts that lose money; we did not check the CFD pages.
Criteria and their weighting are explained in the methodology.
Whether public claims hold up and the firm communicates openly.
An address and working contact channels are published 1
Registered addresses, websites and phone numbers are published for each affiliate.
Material changes are communicated 6
The UK terms are dated and explain when and how Interactive Brokers can change them.
Criteria and their weighting are explained in the methodology.
What our visit confirmed in person: a real, staffed office of the assessed entity, not a ghost address.
We have not checked this firm’s office in person, so this dimension scores zero. We check offices through our on-site verification programme.
Real office at the stated address, not a ghost address
Office of the assessed entity
Staffed and operating
Criteria and their weighting are explained in the methodology.
What our on-site checks and 30-day platform testing found.
We have not completed an on-site assessment of this firm, so this dimension does not count and its weight is shared among the others.
Company identity
Regulatory claims
Office visit
Account opening
Platform usability
Costs and disclosures
Customer support
Deposits and withdrawals
Trading functions
Complaints process
Criteria and their weighting are explained in the methodology.
A brand can trade through several companies, each licensed in a different place with different protections. Check which entity your account would be with.
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) · Reference 208159 2
Listed as Authorised in the FCA's investment firms register, first authorised 6 February 2002.
Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) · Reference C423427 5
Authorised as a MiFID investment firm, and as a crypto-asset service provider under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation.
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) · Reference AFSL 453554 3
Licence start date 28 July 2016.
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) · Reference CMS100917 4
Capital markets services licence: dealing in securities, collective investment schemes, exchange-traded and OTC derivatives and leveraged spot FX; product financing; custodial services.
MAS lists the company as a capital markets services licensee. The directory does not show licence numbers; CMS100917 is the number Interactive Brokers gives on its website.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Registered broker-dealer; member of NYSE, FINRA and SIPC (as stated by Interactive Brokers)
FINRA’s BrokerCheck report for Interactive Brokers LLC (CRD 36418) is cited on this profile for its regulatory history; we did not verify the registration status separately.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
Registered futures commission merchant (as stated by Interactive Brokers)
Securities and Futures Commission (SFC)
We did not check the SFC’s public register.
Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO)
CIRO member and member of the Canadian Investor Protection Fund (as stated by Interactive Brokers)
Financial Services Agency (JFSA) · Reference Kanto Local Finance Bureau No. 187
No licence recorded for this entity.
Warnings, enforcement actions, legal findings, allegations and complaint records are labelled separately. What each label means.
On 30 September 2025 Interactive Brokers LLC consented to censure and fines totalling USD 7.75 million from Nasdaq, NYSE, Cboe-affiliated, MIAX and BOX options exchanges for mismarking about 2.4 million transactions (15.3 million contracts) as customer rather than professional customer orders between 2009 and 2022, because its automated order-counting logic left out certain order types.
On 15 July 2025 OFAC announced that Interactive Brokers LLC agreed to pay USD 11,832,136 to settle apparent violations of several US sanctions programmes between 2016 and 2024, including providing brokerage services to persons in Iran, Cuba, Syria and Crimea and processing transactions involving blocked persons. OFAC found the conduct non-egregious and voluntarily self-disclosed.
On 28 April 2025 the SFC reprimanded and fined Interactive Brokers Hong Kong HKD 4.2 million for lending the securities of 7,911 clients between December 2017 and October 2020 on the basis of expired standing authorities, in breach of the client securities rules. The SFC noted the firm’s self-report and remediation and found no evidence of client loss.
On 30 December 2024 FINRA censured and fined Interactive Brokers LLC USD 2.25 million because its surveillance did not detect customers in cash accounts buying and selling options before paying for them, so it did not impose the required 90-day account freezes.
On 22 December 2023 FINRA censured and fined Interactive Brokers LLC USD 3.5 million, finding that its reviews of customer execution quality were ad hoc, poorly documented and did not consistently assess competing venues or price improvement opportunities, contrary to FINRA’s best execution rules.
On 29 September 2023 the SEC ordered Interactive Brokers LLC to pay USD 35 million, and the CFTC ordered Interactive Brokers Corp. and Interactive Brokers LLC to pay USD 20 million, because employees used unapproved messaging channels for business communications from at least 2019 that the firm did not preserve, and the firm failed to supervise this. The firm agreed to cease and desist and to retain an independent compliance consultant.
On 20 September 2023 ASIC announced that Interactive Brokers Australia had paid AUD 832,500 under an infringement notice from the Markets Disciplinary Panel, which found it negligent in failing to identify suspicious trading by a client in 2021, reckless in allowing further trading after ASIC raised concerns, and lacking the resources needed to comply with the law.
On 30 June 2022 the CFTC found that Interactive Brokers LLC failed to supervise from 2015 to 2021, during which it overcharged customers exchange fees on certain futures spread trades, and ordered it to pay a USD 300,000 penalty and disgorgement of USD 710,828.
On 14 April 2022 NFA’s Business Conduct Committee accepted Interactive Brokers LLC’s settlement offer and fined it USD 250,000 on a complaint that it cancelled retail customer forex orders for reasons NFA rules do not permit and failed to supervise its employees’ forex activities.
On 28 September 2021 the CFTC found that Interactive Brokers LLC failed to supervise diligently in April 2020, when crude oil futures traded at negative prices. It imposed a USD 1.75 million penalty and restitution of USD 82.57 million, which the firm had already paid to customers.
On 10 August 2020 Interactive Brokers LLC agreed to pay USD 11.5 million to the SEC, USD 15 million to FINRA and USD 11.5 million to the CFTC, after the SEC found it failed to file more than 150 suspicious activity reports on potentially manipulative microcap trading, and to retain an independent compliance consultant.
On 25 January 2018 the FCA fined Interactive Brokers (U.K.) Limited GBP 1,049,412 for failing, between February 2014 and February 2015, to have adequate systems to detect and report suspicious transactions that might be market abuse.
Firms can respond to their profile and to any finding. No response has been published for Interactive Brokers. How firms can respond.
| Review date | Result | Methodology | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026 | Trust score 71 out of 100 Sound | 1.2 | Current |
No corrections have been made to this profile.
Lists each Interactive Brokers affiliate with its regulator, registration numbers and registered office: Interactive Brokers (U.K.) Limited (FCA 208159, company 03958476, 20 Fenchurch Street) and its DIFC branch (DFSA F008423); Interactive Brokers LLC (SEC, CFTC, NYSE, FINRA, SIPC); Interactive Brokers Canada Inc. (CIRO, CIPF); Interactive Brokers Ireland Limited (CBI C423427, CRO 657406, Irish Investor Compensation Scheme); Interactive Brokers Australia (AFSL 453554); Interactive Brokers Hong Kong (SFC); Interactive Brokers India (SEBI); Interactive Brokers Securities Japan (Kanto Local Finance Bureau No. 187); Interactive Brokers Singapore (MAS CMS100917). States that IBKR charges no custody fees. The homepage shows a general risk warning but no retail CFD loss percentage.
Shows Interactive Brokers (U.K.) Limited (FRN 208159) with status Authorised, first authorised 6 February 2002.
Lists AFSL 453554 held by Interactive Brokers Australia Pty Ltd (ABN 98166929568), Sydney, from 28 July 2016.
Lists Interactive Brokers Singapore Pte Ltd as a capital markets services licensee for dealing in securities, collective investment schemes, exchange-traded and OTC derivatives and leveraged spot FX, product financing and custodial services. Names Lin Yujun as chief executive officer.
Lists Interactive Brokers Ireland Limited, reference C423427, as an investment firm authorised under Regulation 8(3) of the European Union (Markets in Financial Instruments) Regulations 2017, and as a crypto-asset service provider under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation.
Dated 30 May 2026. Client money is held under the FCA client asset rules in segregated accounts alongside other clients’ assets. IBUK participates in the FSCS. Complaints can be made to IBUK and then to the Financial Ombudsman Service. Negative cash balances are treated as amounts owed to IBUK and an unpaid negative balance is an event of default; we did not find a statement of negative balance protection for retail CFD clients. The terms explain when IBUK may change them.
Annual report filed with the SEC. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market as IBKR; about 73.7% of IBG LLC membership interests are held by IBG Holdings LLC, owned directly and indirectly by founder and chairman Thomas Peterffy and his affiliates.
FINRA’s official report lists more than 100 regulatory events for Interactive Brokers LLC since 2016, most of them settled exchange and FINRA matters. We record individually every action by a government regulator and every self-regulatory action with sanctions of USD 1 million or more since 2016. Smaller matters include FINRA fines of USD 650,000 (August 2025, options account approvals), USD 475,000 (October 2024, stock loan returns), USD 400,000 (April 2025, complaint reporting) and USD 150,000 and 125,000 (2025), a Nasdaq fine of USD 900,000 (December 2025, supervision of potentially manipulative trading through omnibus accounts), Cboe fines of USD 620,000 (July 2025) and NYSE Arca and Nasdaq fines of USD 295,000 and 475,000 (2023 and 2024).
Interactive Brokers LLC agreed, without admitting or denying the findings, to pay USD 11.5 million to the SEC for failing to file more than 150 suspicious activity reports on microcap securities trading, alongside USD 15 million to FINRA and USD 11.5 million to the CFTC (USD 38 million in total), and to retain an independent compliance consultant.
Interactive Brokers LLC agreed to pay USD 11,832,136 to settle apparent violations of several sanctions programmes, including providing services to persons in Iran, Cuba, Syria and Crimea and processing transactions involving blocked persons, between 2016 and 2024. OFAC found the conduct non-egregious and voluntarily self-disclosed.
The FCA fined IBUK GBP 1,049,412 for breaching Principle 3 through inadequate systems for detecting and reporting potential market abuse between February 2014 and February 2015.
The SFC reprimanded and fined Interactive Brokers Hong Kong HKD 4.2 million because, between December 2017 and October 2020, it relied on expired standing authorities of 7,911 clients to lend their securities, owing to a programming error. The SFC noted the firm’s self-report and remediation and found no evidence of client loss.
Interactive Brokers Australia paid AUD 832,500 under an infringement notice from the Markets Disciplinary Panel, which found it negligent in failing to identify suspicious trading by a client in 2021 and reckless in allowing further suspicious trading after ASIC raised concerns.
On 4 October 2026 we reviewed FINRA’s BrokerCheck report, searched the FCA’s, ASIC’s, SFC’s and OFAC’s websites, CySEC’s board decisions and Brazil’s CVM alerts, checked the Indian and Malaysian alert lists, and ran web searches for actions by the Central Bank of Ireland, MAS, CIRO and SEBI. Interactive Brokers is not on the Indian list; the Malaysian list includes only a clone using its name.
Lists Interactive Brokers (U.K.) Limited with 90 new cases in the period and 37% of resolved cases upheld (37.3% for investment complaints), against an average of 34% for investment complaints.
Reports that Interactive Brokers (U.K.) Limited opened 1,116 complaints and closed 1,159 between July and December 2025, all about investments, and upheld 10.7% of them.
Tell us about an error or send evidence. We read every report.